Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 23:10:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F71D2636F503C8925CFF83EA41B149227F9923AEC1F534FE30DB21F0A64FE53
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original post includes factual claims in an opinion piece. The current note does nothing to refute these claims and instead cites aged articles which were published before these recent facts came to light. The note posted is argumentative and misses the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777855646538281250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F71D2636F503C8925CFF83EA41B149227F9923AEC1F534FE30DB21F0A64FE53
  • createdAtMillis - 1712877048359
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17778556465382812501F71D2636F503C8925CFF83EA41B149227F9923AEC1F534FE30DB21F0A64FE53