Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 23:51:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não há nenhuma prova apresentada pelo dito jornalista que comprove que a queda de seguidores se deu pelo algoritmo X e não pois as pessoas que a seguiam discordaram da sua opinião pessoal sobre o tema. Jornalismo deve apresentar provas do que alega ou é mera opinião. https://owlead.com/losing-twitter-followers/#:~:text=These%20bot%2Ffake%20accounts%20were,overnight%20drop%20in%20your%20followers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777824102734016720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1712706661829
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1777824102734016720E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2