Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 21:13:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0026842E7BA6E0D7B865A12D877689B96DE9A7DB19E19F39BC4DE5CA5933C1E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim Cass excluded important groups is misleading. They consulted: “Service users, their families, & support & advocacy groups” & “GPs, paediatricians, child psychiatrists, child psychologists & child psychotherapists” working with gender-questioning children & youth https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Cass-Review-Interim-Report-Final-Web-Accessible.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777800815211577638
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0026842E7BA6E0D7B865A12D877689B96DE9A7DB19E19F39BC4DE5CA5933C1E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1712697191179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17778008152115776380026842E7BA6E0D7B865A12D877689B96DE9A7DB19E19F39BC4DE5CA5933C1E3