Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 03:13:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECC44F32286D3C028E1B69D939A4741ED06F9011A87B6FF0BD45882D52A59629
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is the author's personal opinion and personal request, not saying that "this is false." the article provided for "recent ancestry" is also not recent but from 2000.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777779492368634113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECC44F32286D3C028E1B69D939A4741ED06F9011A87B6FF0BD45882D52A59629
  • createdAtMillis - 1712718824299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777779492368634113ECC44F32286D3C028E1B69D939A4741ED06F9011A87B6FF0BD45882D52A59629