Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 02:24:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E86A143EA9E9DB98A347B2998E15AC29E1B2373550997D8406CDC3B3B339FF2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is the author's personal opinion and personal request, not saying that "this is false." the article provided for "recent ancestry" is also not recent but from 2000.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777779492368634113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E86A143EA9E9DB98A347B2998E15AC29E1B2373550997D8406CDC3B3B339FF2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712715841098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777779492368634113E86A143EA9E9DB98A347B2998E15AC29E1B2373550997D8406CDC3B3B339FF2F