Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 04:49:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A947119235E7D7583C1ED0086F51681182611D9FDE24E1D01911E9B92EB8DEA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is the author's personal opinion and personal request, not saying that "this is false." the article provided for "recent ancestry" is also not recent but from 2000.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777779492368634113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A947119235E7D7583C1ED0086F51681182611D9FDE24E1D01911E9B92EB8DEA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1712724564688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777779492368634113A947119235E7D7583C1ED0086F51681182611D9FDE24E1D01911E9B92EB8DEA5