Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 00:23:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is the author's personal opinion and personal request, not saying that "this is false." the article provided for "recent ancestry" is also not recent but from 2000.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777779492368634113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99
  • createdAtMillis - 1712708616069
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777779492368634113A612F0613E22C4D8D9FDF336906912F99385355BE35ACD2E201DF616C5705D99