Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 21:58:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41831E24ACF62C769AC49E021237377A1E3467C0C7D0D68309AA4E045BF969FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is the author's personal opinion and personal request, not saying that "this is false." the article provided for "recent ancestry" is also not recent but from 2000.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777779492368634113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41831E24ACF62C769AC49E021237377A1E3467C0C7D0D68309AA4E045BF969FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712699923427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177777949236863411341831E24ACF62C769AC49E021237377A1E3467C0C7D0D68309AA4E045BF969FB