Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 17:18:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29AF34E9EB9776E5719E3AD1D5AE6FBDE803ED5D39697357089EB842A2B334B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The note doesn't refute the events in the tweet. It just adds a follow-up of the aftermath which can easily be done, and has been done, just by replying to the tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777775111661379899
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29AF34E9EB9776E5719E3AD1D5AE6FBDE803ED5D39697357089EB842A2B334B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1712769484612
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177777511166137989929AF34E9EB9776E5719E3AD1D5AE6FBDE803ED5D39697357089EB842A2B334B1