Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 23:41:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE35F4263A5E27F0018F9C839016C9220271D8AC9E2FEDFCC4E79B5EA5F1DF75
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道にある「子ども・子育て支援金制度」は子供の有無による負担の差異はありません そのため支援金負担の「子無し税」という記載は誤解を招く表現です https://www.jiji.com/sp/article?k=2024040900516&g=eco

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777703482990158261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE35F4263A5E27F0018F9C839016C9220271D8AC9E2FEDFCC4E79B5EA5F1DF75
  • createdAtMillis - 1712706101307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777703482990158261DE35F4263A5E27F0018F9C839016C9220271D8AC9E2FEDFCC4E79B5EA5F1DF75