Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 20:37:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 325B17A303A262C0C02355E8E5F01AEA3EE5F689309F8D20B940B207DBEBB894
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道にある「子ども・子育て支援金制度」は子供の有無による負担の差異はありません そのため支援金負担の「子無し税」という記載は誤解を招く表現です https://www.jiji.com/sp/article?k=2024040900516&g=eco

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777703482990158261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 325B17A303A262C0C02355E8E5F01AEA3EE5F689309F8D20B940B207DBEBB894
  • createdAtMillis - 1712695051016
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777703482990158261325B17A303A262C0C02355E8E5F01AEA3EE5F689309F8D20B940B207DBEBB894