Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 15:58:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B04FF71FA21C776FBA5A2B91A75C576C9CB1FF09F8D47D42B02C1E2F9CA2636D
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Dado que las puntuaciones son públicas, algunas empresas calculan cuánto azúcar exacto hay que quitar para rebajar los puntos negativos o cuánta fibra hay que añadir para conseguir enmascarar la puntuación negativa del azúcar” Con este método, las empresas obtienen altas notas https://www.lavanguardia.com/comer/tendencias/20230313/8815014/posible-empresas-burlar-nutriscore.amp.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777699878866440512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B04FF71FA21C776FBA5A2B91A75C576C9CB1FF09F8D47D42B02C1E2F9CA2636D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712678280954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777699878866440512B04FF71FA21C776FBA5A2B91A75C576C9CB1FF09F8D47D42B02C1E2F9CA2636D