Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 12:37:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9AB6D476E6D94338AAF624C2B0C3E99334D7B5EC03D9B9B4670F71F639871C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

la note précédente fait référence à l'article ci dessous : https://www.bfmtv.com/paris/une-agence-de-notation-maintient-sa-note-aa-a-paris-la-ville-se-felicite-d-une-gestion-financiere-rigoureuse_AN-202404070171.html qui fait référence à la note de Moody's alors que tweet en question fait référence à l'agence S&P Global Ratings

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777672084157542810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9AB6D476E6D94338AAF624C2B0C3E99334D7B5EC03D9B9B4670F71F639871C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1712666246156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777672084157542810B9AB6D476E6D94338AAF624C2B0C3E99334D7B5EC03D9B9B4670F71F639871C6