Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 10:41:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3E03EB5F66036EF5468C07871C58D5B53F8E98F113EF99014FEEF5D44DB9E2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charge levelled at this post is that Amnesty miss important context but opening the article, Amnesty do mention under ‘Background’ what he was charged with and their opinion that it was under a lower level of proof. Use comments for opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777640054447288663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3E03EB5F66036EF5468C07871C58D5B53F8E98F113EF99014FEEF5D44DB9E2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712659302690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777640054447288663F3E03EB5F66036EF5468C07871C58D5B53F8E98F113EF99014FEEF5D44DB9E2F