Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 12:07:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0A2A572AFCFF83AE57D042B5A2C34F2150AAB9C2AFA56C6CD4EDCCCF43E5EE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charge levelled at this post is that Amnesty miss important context but opening the article, Amnesty do mention under ‘Background’ what he was charged with and their opinion that it was under a lower level of proof. Use comments for opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777640054447288663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0A2A572AFCFF83AE57D042B5A2C34F2150AAB9C2AFA56C6CD4EDCCCF43E5EE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1712664465208
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777640054447288663E0A2A572AFCFF83AE57D042B5A2C34F2150AAB9C2AFA56C6CD4EDCCCF43E5EE5