Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 11:19:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F314FFF4C48696E16B5748D9E3A66C82CBC1444375F3E48F714BDDC47590631
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charge levelled at this post is that Amnesty miss important context but opening the article, Amnesty do mention under ‘Background’ what he was charged with and their opinion that it was under a lower level of proof. Use comments for opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777640054447288663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F314FFF4C48696E16B5748D9E3A66C82CBC1444375F3E48F714BDDC47590631
  • createdAtMillis - 1712661560741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17776400544472886632F314FFF4C48696E16B5748D9E3A66C82CBC1444375F3E48F714BDDC47590631