Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 11:21:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28A3B3599C38E6E9A54EDB59353680B559AB57A69599D0DB276B62650D41D204
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charge levelled at this post is that Amnesty miss important context but opening the article, Amnesty do mention under ‘Background’ what he was charged with and their opinion that it was under a lower level of proof. Use comments for opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777640054447288663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28A3B3599C38E6E9A54EDB59353680B559AB57A69599D0DB276B62650D41D204
  • createdAtMillis - 1712661689285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177764005444728866328A3B3599C38E6E9A54EDB59353680B559AB57A69599D0DB276B62650D41D204