Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 13:34:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01F052051638DC0F303B0CB984F7B8118B7C0F8E25373661CCEC47AFCBE31599
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charge levelled at this post is that Amnesty miss important context but opening the article, Amnesty do mention under ‘Background’ what he was charged with and their opinion that it was under a lower level of proof. Use comments for opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777640054447288663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01F052051638DC0F303B0CB984F7B8118B7C0F8E25373661CCEC47AFCBE31599
  • createdAtMillis - 1712669645573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177764005444728866301F052051638DC0F303B0CB984F7B8118B7C0F8E25373661CCEC47AFCBE31599