Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 09:58:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN O dinheiro alegado na nota provém do executivo e não do judiciário. Não há evidência que o judiciário haja em subordinação do executivo. A nota é claramente uma opinião e deve ser postadas nos comentários e não nas notas da comunidade.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777630622577541442
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1712656703346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777630622577541442D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8