Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 19:58:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35745DDCEE98A39A6FC19C2C63CB772692687D50E1B652EBDCC7D290506D7166
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette personne, sur son compte X, relaie très souvent des comptes jugés comme étant, au mieux, peu fiables, voire complètement délirants, ce qui peut légitimement poser question quant au sérieux scientifique de ses prestations. https://twitter.com/EricRemacle/following

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777599077007409292
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35745DDCEE98A39A6FC19C2C63CB772692687D50E1B652EBDCC7D290506D7166
  • createdAtMillis - 1713038285379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177759907700740929235745DDCEE98A39A6FC19C2C63CB772692687D50E1B652EBDCC7D290506D7166