Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 05:51:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette personne, sur son compte X, relaie très souvent des comptes jugés comme étant, au mieux, peu fiables, voire complètement délirants, ce qui peut légitimement poser question quant au sérieux scientifique de ses prestations. https://twitter.com/EricRemacle/following

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777599077007409292
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712728288398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777599077007409292286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D