Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 04:07:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56FEFDC690BAB04AC6165EB6A94496260FE700C0EC00E13189420B74D72A8C10
Participant Details

Original Note:

選挙報道において有力でない候補の扱いが異なることは「捏造」ではありません。 偏向との指摘については「一般視聴者の関心の動向に応じてその内容が編集さ れることは当然であり、また止むを得ないところである」とする判例が出ています。 https://www.bpo.gr.jp/wordpress/wp-content/themes/codex/pdf/kensyo/determination/2016/25/dec/0.pdf#page=3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777541224821633489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56FEFDC690BAB04AC6165EB6A94496260FE700C0EC00E13189420B74D72A8C10
  • createdAtMillis - 1712635665933
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177754122482163348956FEFDC690BAB04AC6165EB6A94496260FE700C0EC00E13189420B74D72A8C10