Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 04:36:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D949F6E3852F4A1B3BFA992B0A8473F295FDE6E709C25B0852B18AFFB48EF252
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poll questions were not framed in the usual way to elicit an accurate sample of opinion but were framed to elicit extremes, which could then be used in sensationalist reports. See this analysis of the poll's manipulative framing: https://twitter.com/sundersays/status/1777072573873864914?t=5QXg8VraKWcUNZc4CGuriQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1777463795700445622
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D949F6E3852F4A1B3BFA992B0A8473F295FDE6E709C25B0852B18AFFB48EF252
createdAtMillis - 1712637370322
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1777463795700445622D949F6E3852F4A1B3BFA992B0A8473F295FDE6E709C25B0852B18AFFB48EF252