Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 14:26:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poll questions were not framed in the usual way to elicit an accurate sample of opinion but were framed to elicit extremes, which could then be used in sensationalist reports. See this analysis of the poll's manipulative framing: https://twitter.com/sundersays/status/1777072573873864914?t=5QXg8VraKWcUNZc4CGuriQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1777463795700445622
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B
createdAtMillis - 1712672816962
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1777463795700445622D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B