Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 06:40:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAEF712041C51D3B4FC5CC9C21839347981A9251773514FF340097F0116BFA47
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge leading this effort has had a history of jailing people without a trial for posts on social media that he said attacked Brazil’s institutions. He has also ordered social networks to remove thousands of posts and videos with little room for appeal. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777411776725864603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAEF712041C51D3B4FC5CC9C21839347981A9251773514FF340097F0116BFA47
  • createdAtMillis - 1712644842852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1777411776725864603BAEF712041C51D3B4FC5CC9C21839347981A9251773514FF340097F0116BFA47