Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 20:38:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79EE2D953ECF232B52CCCD3869DC19C257A20D752CAB844844ED619AFC25CADF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota es para aclarar la tergiversación que Antonio Maestre hace, dando claramente a entender que el alcalde de Madrid pagó 166.000€ por un piso que debería costar mucho más. Su tweet en ningún momento parece una burla a 20m, como se ve en los comentarios. https://twitter.com/AntonioMaestre/status/1777287503902355741?t=sRIccHpgxkGpAgBYDj8BAA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777397371745312874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79EE2D953ECF232B52CCCD3869DC19C257A20D752CAB844844ED619AFC25CADF
  • createdAtMillis - 1712608733355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 177739737174531287479EE2D953ECF232B52CCCD3869DC19C257A20D752CAB844844ED619AFC25CADF