Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 19:12:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 415415CAF262FA02EA48F228A95552810D5D0DF3262BC5E8F2D600419155F7B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Calling it aggressive censorship is an opinion. You can call it regulation and link to sources that do the same, but that does not invalidate the perspective that it is censorship. If important context is missing, write a new note with sources that do not require a subscription.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777383463093518407
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 415415CAF262FA02EA48F228A95552810D5D0DF3262BC5E8F2D600419155F7B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1712603574535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777383463093518407415415CAF262FA02EA48F228A95552810D5D0DF3262BC5E8F2D600419155F7B1