Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 08:48:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Calling it aggressive censorship is an opinion. You can call it regulation and link to sources that do the same, but that does not invalidate the perspective that it is censorship. If important context is missing, write a new note with sources that do not require a subscription.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777383463093518407
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712652481999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777383463093518407284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D