Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 22:06:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

District of Columbia V Heller has already addressed this as unconstitutional. https://www.britannica.com/event/District-of-Columbia-v-Heller

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777335051316826564
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1712613973582
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17773350513168265644687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E