Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 02:43:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B94419E60855880A6B9652C469CB915137116BD1EE92D57EB3DC3989DD498184
Participant Details

Original Note:

En el artículo citado, menciona que los artículos revisados contenían errores metodológicos. Además de que 25 de los 47 reportes de los Ensayos Clínicos Aleatorizados (53.2%) no demostraron eficacia y al final el se contradice diciendo que la ivermectina sí es eficaz. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/antibiotics/77/1/77_45/_article/-char/en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777224823409631505
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B94419E60855880A6B9652C469CB915137116BD1EE92D57EB3DC3989DD498184
  • createdAtMillis - 1712630607810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777224823409631505B94419E60855880A6B9652C469CB915137116BD1EE92D57EB3DC3989DD498184