Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-09 15:18:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0AD45E201B08F6F52D922EABDD1780662FF39E2A9DD6371DB5FF9A92EC0EB10
Participant Details

Original Note:

This " journalist" was told specifically that the top backer had no issues, and to retract the hit piece https://twitter.com/GigabearPanda/status/1776859758030377357?t=uoV6Nt0ZqrkAYQum_cMJPQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777219250836447591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0AD45E201B08F6F52D922EABDD1780662FF39E2A9DD6371DB5FF9A92EC0EB10
  • createdAtMillis - 1712675924369
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1777219250836447591D0AD45E201B08F6F52D922EABDD1780662FF39E2A9DD6371DB5FF9A92EC0EB10