Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 01:51:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68
Participant Details

Original Note:

This " journalist" was told specifically that the top backer had no issues, and to retract the hit piece https://twitter.com/GigabearPanda/status/1776859758030377357?t=uoV6Nt0ZqrkAYQum_cMJPQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777219250836447591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68
  • createdAtMillis - 1714009919600
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17772192508364475910FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68