Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 08:59:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing a key point. If the speech of Höcke was indeed illegal as claimed by the notes, then Germany would be suppressing free speech, proving his point. As he is indeed standing trial for saying a phrase used by SA, Höcke's claim of being suppressed is correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777198977206632952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1715763581980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777198977206632952FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3