Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 09:44:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF67EDAF7AC96E9AACC70527F8EC86732FA28D4D01CA926CCC59B58ECD6A89E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing a key point. If the speech of Höcke was indeed illegal as claimed by the notes, then Germany would be suppressing free speech, proving his point. As he is indeed standing trial for saying a phrase used by SA, Höcke's claim of being suppressed is correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777198977206632952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF67EDAF7AC96E9AACC70527F8EC86732FA28D4D01CA926CCC59B58ECD6A89E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1715766270449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777198977206632952EF67EDAF7AC96E9AACC70527F8EC86732FA28D4D01CA926CCC59B58ECD6A89E3