Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 22:35:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBE4E51D68E45A696D734917EE1F74EF3BFC3F8B98871FF23E4B0DBD82329E61
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing a key point. If the speech of Höcke was indeed illegal as claimed by the notes, then Germany would be suppressing free speech, proving his point. As he is indeed standing trial for saying a phrase used by SA, Höcke's claim of being suppressed is correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777198977206632952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBE4E51D68E45A696D734917EE1F74EF3BFC3F8B98871FF23E4B0DBD82329E61
  • createdAtMillis - 1715726124765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777198977206632952EBE4E51D68E45A696D734917EE1F74EF3BFC3F8B98871FF23E4B0DBD82329E61