Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 17:46:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing a key point. If the speech of Höcke was indeed illegal as claimed by the notes, then Germany would be suppressing free speech, proving his point. As he is indeed standing trial for saying a phrase used by SA, Höcke's claim of being suppressed is correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777198977206632952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1715795193126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17771989772066329525D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D