Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 01:58:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1A076631FEFFC010FA09932232A4286408CD5BD0607C0049CD7AF8D81123CDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

O autor da nota está errado. Os países mencionados pelo autor da nota não baniram o Twitter, nem mesmo temporariamente. Na própria página do Wikipédia, é dito que esses países apenas pediram (ou pretendiam) o banimento de ALGUMAS CONTAS, e não em banir a rede social Twitter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Twitter#%3A%7E%3Atext%3DIn_some_cases%2C_governments_and%2Chave_blocked_access_to_X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777119898985967625
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1A076631FEFFC010FA09932232A4286408CD5BD0607C0049CD7AF8D81123CDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1712541525101
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777119898985967625A1A076631FEFFC010FA09932232A4286408CD5BD0607C0049CD7AF8D81123CDA