Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 18:30:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C012A6C47751E2F02B916B55F7B28A367EE71565FA6BA81C174762B7EE4A15AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's easy to understand the claim, and it is suspicious. However, speaking hypothetically - since Erel never finished the point and was disrupted in mid sentence, it's hard to officially and strictly claim that. and the source given was cut as he was trying to end the argument

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777032167106740434
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C012A6C47751E2F02B916B55F7B28A367EE71565FA6BA81C174762B7EE4A15AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1712514609422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777032167106740434C012A6C47751E2F02B916B55F7B28A367EE71565FA6BA81C174762B7EE4A15AE