Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 13:57:36 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259
Participant Details

Original Note:

Brazilian constitution does not treat freedom of speech in the same manner as the first amendment in the US, so the claim about the minister breaking the constitution is a misrepresentation of freedom of speech is in Brazil https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_Brazil#:~:text=6%20External%20links-,Article%205,Constitution%20of%20Brazil%20in%201988.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777022678701949291
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259
  • createdAtMillis - 1712584656056
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1777022678701949291C013F28040FE0E7A96F3B7FB7647191A1E8E16B3DFD9D02D467BBC0EA0ECB259