Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 19:35:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Brazilian constitution does not treat freedom of speech in the same manner as the first amendment in the US, so the claim about the minister breaking the constitution is a misrepresentation of freedom of speech is in Brazil https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_Brazil#:~:text=6%20External%20links-,Article%205,Constitution%20of%20Brazil%20in%201988.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777022678701949291
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712518516894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17770226787019492910EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB