Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 16:14:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF6EEDC1B3F210BF733D8238F7B6B8E1FE41CDD7BEEAC3748070E1DF246D6583
Participant Details

Original Note:

What every CN are failing to address is that the whole reason this is being published is for allegedly not respecting due legal processed, violating Brazil’s own constitution, Marco Civil and Twitter’s policies without court order. Everything else is irrelevant. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1776763213666779317?s=46&t=rDNhMYp2loTFAkIFyB67yw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777001077893730317
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF6EEDC1B3F210BF733D8238F7B6B8E1FE41CDD7BEEAC3748070E1DF246D6583
  • createdAtMillis - 1712506454983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777001077893730317DF6EEDC1B3F210BF733D8238F7B6B8E1FE41CDD7BEEAC3748070E1DF246D6583