Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 19:30:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15004AE45D03C6CADB1E7DD8B678A5EF0CFBF0D0F3EA5A2B2D9D9673F074BB29
Participant Details

Original Note:

What every CN are failing to address is that the whole reason this is being published is for allegedly not respecting due legal processed, violating Brazil’s own constitution, Marco Civil and Twitter’s policies without court order. Everything else is irrelevant. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1776763213666779317?s=46&t=rDNhMYp2loTFAkIFyB67yw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777001077893730317
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15004AE45D03C6CADB1E7DD8B678A5EF0CFBF0D0F3EA5A2B2D9D9673F074BB29
  • createdAtMillis - 1712518211367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177700107789373031715004AE45D03C6CADB1E7DD8B678A5EF0CFBF0D0F3EA5A2B2D9D9673F074BB29