Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-08 17:22:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E91092D589FEE6907C4E52EB09BEF4449AFC6AC1A8A09BC80B493CAFC6C5E8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

What every CN are failing to address is that the whole reason this is being published is for allegedly not respecting due legal processed, violating Brazil’s own constitution, Marco Civil and Twitter’s policies without court order. Everything else is irrelevant. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1776763213666779317?s=46&t=rDNhMYp2loTFAkIFyB67yw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777000849161568277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E91092D589FEE6907C4E52EB09BEF4449AFC6AC1A8A09BC80B493CAFC6C5E8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1712596958512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17770008491615682779E91092D589FEE6907C4E52EB09BEF4449AFC6AC1A8A09BC80B493CAFC6C5E8E