Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 22:36:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7FD71FD4A0A72F3811263BA6B795720694BA53A1B9BC6C0B457DC53BEF9CF5B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

What every CN are failing to address is that the whole reason this is being published is for allegedly not respecting due legal processed, violating Brazil’s own constitution, Marco Civil and Twitter’s policies without court order. Everything else is irrelevant. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1776763213666779317?s=46&t=rDNhMYp2loTFAkIFyB67yw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777000849161568277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7FD71FD4A0A72F3811263BA6B795720694BA53A1B9BC6C0B457DC53BEF9CF5B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1712529360496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17770008491615682777FD71FD4A0A72F3811263BA6B795720694BA53A1B9BC6C0B457DC53BEF9CF5B8