Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 18:10:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E7A5CB9F1F31C3D7201195C856DEF3EDB05AA6CEC9F03EF4A6D8FE9901A273A
Participant Details

Original Note:

What every CN are failing to address is that the whole reason this is being published is for allegedly not respecting due legal processed, violating Brazil’s own constitution, Marco Civil and Twitter’s policies without court order. Everything else is irrelevant. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1776763213666779317?s=46&t=rDNhMYp2loTFAkIFyB67yw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777000849161568277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E7A5CB9F1F31C3D7201195C856DEF3EDB05AA6CEC9F03EF4A6D8FE9901A273A
  • createdAtMillis - 1712513432350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17770008491615682772E7A5CB9F1F31C3D7201195C856DEF3EDB05AA6CEC9F03EF4A6D8FE9901A273A