Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-07 05:11:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ABDFF4E266E62974DE5186BCA41809AF5739149EDA0F2FA2D17181F1337F3709
Participant Details

Original Note:

一つの建物であろうと 区分所有権があったり 所有者と使用者が違ったり 権利及び決定権者特定するのに、時間と人手が必要であり、 その上で解体費用を出す主体と、解体作業を行う業者が決まらないと、解体できません https://kinki.env.go.jp/content/000108864.pdf https://kaitaihiroba.com/52/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/special/saigai/select-news/20201020_01.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776801609131143613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ABDFF4E266E62974DE5186BCA41809AF5739149EDA0F2FA2D17181F1337F3709
  • createdAtMillis - 1712466703863
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1776801609131143613ABDFF4E266E62974DE5186BCA41809AF5739149EDA0F2FA2D17181F1337F3709