Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 01:01:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed - the note declares the polling numbers to be wrong, but offers no evidence to doubt that the Gallego campaign got that result in their private polling. Polling averages often provide useful context, but are not counter-evidence that an internal poll exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776449013006385576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E
  • createdAtMillis - 1712970097997
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1776449013006385576A5549ED322650EE50123197930B0AA7B0DC1CCFF041E0C91F7FC9A43AC59411E