Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 16:27:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E7D9CCC73C54FFB243B0D4518C12842B2ED2A7754AD226F28E4FD38FA0ABC0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed - the note declares the polling numbers to be wrong, but offers no evidence to doubt that the Gallego campaign got that result in their private polling. Polling averages often provide useful context, but are not counter-evidence that an internal poll exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776449013006385576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E7D9CCC73C54FFB243B0D4518C12842B2ED2A7754AD226F28E4FD38FA0ABC0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1712420858370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17764490130063855765E7D9CCC73C54FFB243B0D4518C12842B2ED2A7754AD226F28E4FD38FA0ABC0E