Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-14 00:04:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed - the note declares the polling numbers to be wrong, but offers no evidence to doubt that the Gallego campaign got that result in their private polling. Polling averages often provide useful context, but are not counter-evidence that an internal poll exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776449013006385576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713053048226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17764490130063855764687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E