Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 21:58:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed - the note declares the polling numbers to be wrong, but offers no evidence to doubt that the Gallego campaign got that result in their private polling. Polling averages often provide useful context, but are not counter-evidence that an internal poll exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776449013006385576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1712440703576
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177644901300638557613A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE